So, you are accusing me of being stupid? What seems to be your problem for publicly assaulting me without underlining comment? Also Bosse what is your problem?
I just wonder what the idea is, to post photos at all, when they are so full of watermarks, that they are more or less worthless.
And – no offence! – but do you have the copyright for these photos?
I just wonder what the idea is, to post photos at all, when they are so full of watermarks, that they are more or less worthless.
And – no offence! – but do you have the copyright for these photos?
If you have a problem with them being "full of watermarks" ignore it and don't start useless dicussions. Sadly due many lowlives .. who steal from others to make a profit on their own ... people are forced to do this. BTW: the PicMarkr Pro Demo isn't something I've done but the software who automaticly had done it as it was a demo.
Most of the photographs were given by the family and/ or the veterans who gave full permission. Others were asked to use and others were bought, those who got KIA - sadly - I can't ask permission anymore. It is a useless discussion to start .. but do you have ... All millions of photographs, postcards, documents.. that are sold on ebay/ auction houses/ shown in musea etcetera .. Anyone asked permission there or is able to do so?
But hey, I've done you a favour as well as George, and delete the whole sh' bam. I'm writing a book on them now, so for a (small) fee to preserve history you can see them without watermarks.
Well, my intention wasn´t to insult you, believe it or not, but I still can´t see the meaning of posting photos like that, no matter who put the marks there.
But I will follow your advise, and just ignore. OK?
Regards,
Ludwig
If you have a problem with them being "full of watermarks" ignore it and don't start useless dicussions. Sadly due many lowlives .. who steal from others to make a profit on their own ... people are forced to do this. BTW: the PicMarkr Pro Demo isn't something I've done but the software who automaticly had done it as it was a demo.
Most of the photographs were given by the family and/ or the veterans who gave full permission. Others were asked to use and others were bought, those who got KIA - sadly - I can't ask permission anymore. It is a useless discussion to start .. but do you have ... All millions of photographs, postcards, documents.. that are sold on ebay/ auction houses/ shown in musea etcetera .. Anyone asked permission there or is able to do so?
But hey, I've done you a favour as well as George, and delete the whole sh' bam. I'm writing a book on them now, so for a (small) fee to preserve history you can see them without watermarks.
Well, my intention wasn´t to insult you, believe it or not, but I still can´t see the meaning of posting photos like that, no matter who put the marks there.
But I will follow your advise, and just ignore. OK?
Regards,
Ludwig
And I will build social bridges, thats is, to post Pictures naked!
Guess he has just been awarded the EK1 and instead of trying to penetrate the quite thick tunic cloth, the awarding officer just stuck the EK into the Pilot´s badge! Nice detail!
Guess he has just been awarded the EK1 and instead of trying to penetrate the quite thick tunic cloth, the awarding officer just stuck the EK into the Pilot´s badge! Nice detail!
Yes that is exactly what he did ! No wonder some crosses & badges have condition problems Tom
Comment