Helmut Wick Signature : Signed or Printed ?

[Klauklau]

Hi all !

A little today's find, for nearly nothing :

A Helmut Wick Photo, no date on the back.
(Backside text : "Aus der Luftwaffen-Illustrierten Der Adler--Druck August Scherl Nachf. Berlin SW68")

With a signature of Wick. But the problem is that I don't know if it is a true signed, or a period-printed one.

Can you help me ?





The signature isn't like on the usual printed one : not "Helmut Wick", but here it is just "Wick"

Here is another :
http://forum.axishistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=12770

[TH0791]

printed

[frankandfrank]

Prindet

[Klauklau]

Thanks alot mates !

All my doubts are gone now !

[Fredo]

Bonsoir,
But it is strange that printed because i have too a postcard of Helmut Wick(Backside text : "Aus der Luftwaffen-Illustrierten Der Adler--Druck August Scherl Nachf. Berlin SW68") signed only Wick, but not exacly in the same place than yours.
Why printed a sign in different place ?
Fredo

[TH0791]

Bonsoir,
But it is strange that printed because i have too a postcard of Helmut Wick(Backside text : "Aus der Luftwaffen-Illustrierten Der Adler--Druck August Scherl Nachf. Berlin SW68") signed only Wick, but not exacly in the same place than yours.
Why printed a sign in different place ?
Fredo

It's a photo of stamp signed postcard

[Trebes]

If you cannot judge from the original photo how can you expect someone to judge from a scan?

Trebes

[TH0791]

You know what? it can be a photo of a stamped postcard of a stamped postcard, but it's not a handwritten autograph for sure. His autograph is very rare and almost all of his alleged autographs are fakes.