Help on four signatures

[bertastan]

Are these authentic ?

1 List

2 Steiner

[bertastan]

3 Fegelein

4 Globocnik

[VtwinVince]

I don't know about List, but I like the paperwork.

[PHILBROWN]

hermann fegelein is 100% good

[Jeremy]

Sigs

Re Steiner, see:

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...hlight=steiner

IMO, I don't like the List or Steiner...

Some other Steiner for comparison attached...

[max history]

The List and Steiner are obvious forgeries. The Fegelein and Globocnik both leave me feeling uncomfortable and require closer examination, especially the Globocnik. The Fegelein leans more to being OK, but I would still not be be committed without physical examination.
Max.

[bertastan]

Thanks for the replies. I had a feeling that maybe the Fegelein might have a chance after seeing a sample in a book.
Thanks
Stan

[Jeremy]

fakes

A bit predictable I suppose, but here is the crap fegelein sig style from the fake factory for interest sake...

[Ralljg52]

Hi Bertastan

I would not take any notice of the remarks by Jeremy he lives in a weird warped world of his own he's got no idea what he's talking about , as for Max who is he , after all I have asked before , apparently he lives up the road from me I would love for him to make contact or even pay me a visit we could then discuss his expertise and knowlage over a nice cup of tea.
Come on Max I have nothing against you in person , come pay me a civalised visit and we can have a good chat.

Kindest Regards

Colin Frost
Legends Aviation Gallery

[VtwinVince]

I think people need to know who you are, Mr. Frost. You come on here as a noob, with guns blazing, making disparaging remarks about members in good standing. Good way to make a first impression.

[Glowlight]

Who is Max? He is one of the few people I would trust to tell me the truth on signatures, thats who.

[pfeil335]

Max has my vote as the most eminent trustworthy independent expert on here.

The rubbish spouted about a conspiracy against those small number of dealers selling questionable material is laughable. Pure diversionary tactics...

We owe Jeremy a great debt for standing up and bringing this to the attention of collectors.

When you compare a authentic signature and its "factory " equivalent its like seeing night and day!

Grtz

pfeil

[crfraser]

Max has my vote as the most eminent trustworthy independent expert on here.

The rubbish spouted about a conspiracy against those small number of dealers selling questionable material is laughable. Pure diversionary tactics...

We owe Jeremy a great debt for standing up and bringing this to the attention of collectors.

When you compare a authentic signature and its "factory " equivalent its like seeing night and day!

Grtz

pfeil

Ditto, ibid and here here....most importantly Max is willing to admit he may be wrong and has no obvious vested interests to protect except a well earned credibility on multiple sites.

Colin

[Ralljg52]

Gentlemen

May I bring it to your attention my post , post20 on the Lent thread it may help you understand a little more.

Kindest Regards
Colin Frost
Legends Aviation Gallery

[PHILBROWN]

The List and Steiner are obvious forgeries. The Fegelein and Globocnik both leave me feeling uncomfortable and require closer examination, especially the Globocnik. The Fegelein leans more to being OK, but I would still not be be committed without physical examination.
Max.

max, the fegelein is a very common and genuine example of this type of doc,ive owned several, the obglocnick is also a good one,i"d buy these two in an instant, please dont think im being rude,i just know fegeleins sig and the paper its written on