panzer assault document

[Hofstetter]

Hi, appreciate some opinions on this document
Regards
Greg

[Hofstetter]

a

[Hofstetter]

m

[Hofstetter]

n

[Simon O.]

What do you make of the fp number and how does the sig compare with known examples of Becker's?

[Justin P]

What do you make of the fp number and how does the sig compare with known examples of Becker's?

I cant make out the FP 162?? Maybe its me eyes! I can see a Green tinge---Maybe the Pic?) Sig, looks free flowing and Natural. but Ive not checked against others.

[PzV]

The "a" and the "f" in Panzerkampfabzeichen are not completely printed. Can you blow up these letters on your scanner? One can often see if the print is in dots (modern print) or offset. I am always a bit wary of single documents or does this belong to a group?

[hucks216]

I think the FpNr begins with 1320x (x=unknown number) and this is the FpNr listing for 13203..

(1.8.1943-23.3.1944) 7.2.1944 Regimentsstab u. Stabskompanie SS-Panzergrenadier-Regiment 6 (3. SS-Division),

(7.11.1944-Kriegsende) 9.11.1944 Regimentsstab Panzergrenadier-Regiment 6 (3. SS-Division).

[Hofstetter]

Simon, I can't make out the fp number, but i think Hucks is on the money with 1320x (x= unknown no.)
Here's a pic of the only other signiature i've found so far , it's from a previous post here on the forum, ( the document looks very different , the signiature ?, a little different too)

[Hofstetter]

PzV,
Tried to blow up the pic but the quality of the pic isn't very good, yes it's a single doc.

[keifer kahn]

I have no comment on the information details but the "fleks" on the printing is always a good sign for an original doc.

[Simon O.]

Tough one, the differences in the sig are a worry, one for Max History. It's tough to see but it looks like the stamps may be slightly different but i'm really unsure given what we can see of the first.

[Hofstetter]

Tough one, the differences in the sig are a worry, one for Max History. It's tough to see but it looks like the stamps may be slightly different but i'm really unsure given what we can see of the first.

Thanks for the comments guys, yes Simon i was hoping Max might spot this and give an opinion.
Regards
Greg

[PzV]

Greg,

it is not printed with a dot/matrix printer at least and the deletions could be a print error. If you must not have this document however I would advise to stay away from it (especially if it is only a single document).

Jim

[Hofstetter]

Greg,

it is not printed with a dot/matrix printer at least and the deletions could be a print error. If you must not have this document however I would advise to stay away from it (especially if it is only a single document).

Jim

Thanks Jim
Regards
Greg