AH paper, good or copy?

[org.todt]

Hello
Is it good or copy?
thank you
Olivier
<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i36.tinypic.com/11813f7.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>
<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i36.tinypic.com/2hn819d.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>
<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i33.tinypic.com/vie4l.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>
<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i36.tinypic.com/25u390y.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

[max history]

It's very difficult to judge from your images which are not sharp enough. Here are two genuine examples. You can compare for yourself.
Hitler's stationery was of the highest quality printing and the paper was double page.
Max.

[max history]

And Berlin.....

[max history]

As you can see, Olivier's example does not have the defined crispness in the printing as in the others, but that might just be the quality of his photographic images. Personally, I think that his example requires closer examination.
Max.

[max history]

Nobody else have a comment?
Max.

[Justin P]

Oliviers Does lack fine detail, like you mention Max. straight on photos in Daylight would help

[max history]

Any reply from Olivier (or anyone else)?
Max.

[org.todt]

New pics

new pics:

<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i38.tinypic.com/okcu8k.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>
<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i33.tinypic.com/k2l2qc.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>
<a href="http://fr.tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i35.tinypic.com/nosw21.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></a>

[max history]

Olivier,
Thanks for posting these new pics. Based on these and your previous images, I don't think your stationery is original. It just does not have the quality of an authentic piece. Sorry.
Max.

[org.todt]

Olivier,
Thanks for posting these new pics. Based on these and your previous images, I don't think your stationery is original. It just does not have the quality of an authentic piece. Sorry.
Max.

No problem. I ask before buy it.
So if wrong, i don't buy it

thank you
Olivier

[clevischi]

IMO Max is right.

[max history]

Does anyone else have an input and maybe post some images?
Max.

[max history]

Here is another example of stationery supposed to be that of Hitler. It is commonly sold as authentic personal stationery and is usually to be found on plain off-white correspondence cards. The embossed eagle and swastika and initials AH have no colouring. Personally, I doubt stationery such as this was ever used by Hitler and I believe all those offered for sale are of post-war manufacture. Notice the poor quality, highly absorbent card material used and the low grade embossing. For my money, these are fantasy pieces.
What do others think please?
Regards,
Max.