Greetings.
I have had this "PATURKUNDE" document for several years and believed the signature to have been manually signed by Hitler. Later, a gentleman who deals in documents said Hitler was Godfather to thousands of German babies and this signature was an autopen.
In the letter that accompanied the document to the parents, the writer said their daughter would be receiving RM 50 from the Führer. Yesterday I mailed a nice scan of the signature to a collector in Florida who has a document signed with the autopen and they are not even close to looking alike.
I have posted a scan of the douments for you experts to look at, and a scan of the signature. The Florida collector's signature showed even pressure of ink over the whole signature. My signature shows light spots and little ink hooks and a bubble or two. What do folks think? This is clearly not my area.
Thanks for any help.
Dan.
I have had this "PATURKUNDE" document for several years and believed the signature to have been manually signed by Hitler. Later, a gentleman who deals in documents said Hitler was Godfather to thousands of German babies and this signature was an autopen.
In the letter that accompanied the document to the parents, the writer said their daughter would be receiving RM 50 from the Führer. Yesterday I mailed a nice scan of the signature to a collector in Florida who has a document signed with the autopen and they are not even close to looking alike.
I have posted a scan of the douments for you experts to look at, and a scan of the signature. The Florida collector's signature showed even pressure of ink over the whole signature. My signature shows light spots and little ink hooks and a bubble or two. What do folks think? This is clearly not my area.
Thanks for any help.
Dan.
Comment