Hello Richard, I appreciate the analysis and have come to the same conclusion. It is a spot on document other than the postion of the cross. Even the detail and the color of the cross is correct. I have sent a request to the seller for any provenance. The only other thing that I have noticed is the Keitel signature does not seem to have as pronounced a "hook" on the t as most other examples I have seen but this can be attributed to variance in original signatures. I am baffeled by this document and would really feel somewhat more secure if I could find at least one other example with a misprint such as this. I can see how it may have slipped through as it is not too obvious and would not really stand out unless you were really scrutinizing the document. Understandibly it is an error that could realistically happen as the cross was applied in a separate printing than the print. Thanks again for the opinions.
Richard V
Richard V
Comment