EdelweissAntique

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opinions of this document?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Opinions of this document?

    Hello

    <O></O>

    I would like some opinions of this document; it is signed by Sepp Dietrich.

    <O></O>

    Thanks

    Derek

    <O></O>
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Derek Crouch; 06-11-2005, 08:50 AM.

    #2
    2

    2
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      3

      3
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        doc

        Hello
        I have been informed that the "D" in Dietrich looks hestiant and shaky.

        2. Ranks are typed as “SS-Unterscharführer” with no spacing. The same can be said of the spacing either side of the hyphen in “Berlin-Lichterfelde”. Abbreviated versions of SS ranks were normally typed as “SS-U’Scharf.” and not as shown.

        3. The assignment “12./SS A.H.” is wrong and would normally appear as “12./LSSAH” or even sometimes “12./SS-LAH

        Your opinions would be greatly appreciated.

        thanks
        Derek Crouch

        Comment


          #5
          -

          IMO it looks OK!

          Comment


            #6
            I'm not sure about the points raised regarding the notation, it might be carelessness or variation, or it may be a repro, but in my opinion the signature, at least, looks ok.

            Comment


              #7
              doc

              Hello
              Thanks for the opinions!

              Derek

              Comment


                #8
                Perfect signature on your document , see this for other ex. , one of them is like yours ...

                http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...248#post945248

                Gr. marc

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by MVV
                  Perfect signature on your document , see this for other ex. , one of them is like yours ...

                  http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...248#post945248

                  Gr. marc
                  I certainly wouldn't say the signature was perfect. The document is the thing that looks wrong. And just take a look at the other signatures.
                  Max.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Max, as the document looks like it was typed up individually rather than being a mass printed version that would then share its characteristics with every other document of that type. What makes it appear wrong to you? You don't have to be specific so as not to tip off any would be forgers but was there a particular style or set up as to how these docs were typed up that tipped you off that this one is suspicious?
                    Richard V

                    Comment


                      #11
                      document

                      Hello
                      So, is the general agreement that I should return this document and get my money back?

                      Derek

                      Comment

                      Users Viewing this Thread

                      Collapse

                      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                      Working...
                      X