Hello again Thomas,
I take your point but in this case I am not giving an opinion I am reporting the situation I found my self in where I brought one of these badges in question from a veteran.
If I had to stand up in court and was asked, "did you buy this ball hinge glider badge from this veteran on this particular day"
I would not answer, "in my opinion I did buy that badge"
they would say in such a case that they were not interested in opinions, they were interested in facts so I either did or I did not and a simple yes or no answer would do so "yes I did buy a ball hinge glider badge from a veteran who was at the war and stated to me in all honesty that he brought the badge back from the war"
There is no opinion from me about this needed, I am providing evidence of a fact to the forum.
If I am rubbing people up the wrong way then I most certainly apologise but I too have to do a lot of professional research and I work with some of the most qualified researchers in their fields in the world. I am very use to receiving and having to give critical analysis. It goes with the territory and if any research can not stand up to it then what does it say about the research and the quality of the research let alone the conclusion being made from it.
You are right, none of us know it all but the more we share the more we all learn and that is my intention so again I repeat my apology to you or anyone else here feeling up set but I have a duty with this to be as honest as I can to get to the facts of the matter.
Stijn's research certainly shows that none of the glider pilots who he interviewed got the ball hinge glider. A surprising finding for me but an important and revealing one for sure. This however does not prove that they were not made before May 1945 or stocked but it might imply that the awarding of the ball hinge glider was a rare occurance.
Without more information what more could one take out of this ?
With respect, Chris
I take your point but in this case I am not giving an opinion I am reporting the situation I found my self in where I brought one of these badges in question from a veteran.
If I had to stand up in court and was asked, "did you buy this ball hinge glider badge from this veteran on this particular day"
I would not answer, "in my opinion I did buy that badge"
they would say in such a case that they were not interested in opinions, they were interested in facts so I either did or I did not and a simple yes or no answer would do so "yes I did buy a ball hinge glider badge from a veteran who was at the war and stated to me in all honesty that he brought the badge back from the war"
There is no opinion from me about this needed, I am providing evidence of a fact to the forum.
If I am rubbing people up the wrong way then I most certainly apologise but I too have to do a lot of professional research and I work with some of the most qualified researchers in their fields in the world. I am very use to receiving and having to give critical analysis. It goes with the territory and if any research can not stand up to it then what does it say about the research and the quality of the research let alone the conclusion being made from it.
You are right, none of us know it all but the more we share the more we all learn and that is my intention so again I repeat my apology to you or anyone else here feeling up set but I have a duty with this to be as honest as I can to get to the facts of the matter.
Stijn's research certainly shows that none of the glider pilots who he interviewed got the ball hinge glider. A surprising finding for me but an important and revealing one for sure. This however does not prove that they were not made before May 1945 or stocked but it might imply that the awarding of the ball hinge glider was a rare occurance.
Without more information what more could one take out of this ?
With respect, Chris
Comment