HisCol

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My Destroyer fleet

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    And the last one but the most interesting - judging from the hardware it looks like zinc unmarked F&B..., but
    - it has totally different obverse design than marked L/21 zincers that we knew so far;
    - at the first glance the dimensions are also different but I have not measured it yet with calipers;
    - the planchet of L/21 marked zincer is twice as thick compared to the unmarked one; and
    - the base material of the unmarked one in hands makes impression as if it was made of tombak and not zinc, very similiar feeling as with uncommon tombak Deumer destroyer with zinc-like hardware. Strange...

    Anyway, I hope you like it since the condition is just great.
    Cheers,
    Hubert
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #47
      I just compared that strange zincer with F&B hardware with my other destroyers and from obverse design it matches tombak P&L! Is it possible that this is the first P&L zinc KM badge that we know? I Wonder what others think of it?
      Cheers,
      Hubert
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by BubbaZ View Post
        And the last one but the most interesting - judging from the hardware it looks like zinc unmarked F&B..., but
        - it has totally different obverse design than marked L/21 zincers that we knew so far;
        - at the first glance the dimensions are also different but I have not measured it yet with calipers;
        - the planchet of L/21 marked zincer is twice as thick compared to the unmarked one; and
        - the base material of the unmarked one in hands makes impression as if it was made of tombak and not zinc, very similiar feeling as with uncommon tombak Deumer destroyer with zinc-like hardware. Strange...

        Anyway, I hope you like it since the condition is just great.
        Cheers,
        Hubert
        Hi Hubert,

        Great additions to your collection.

        You're quite correct that the vertical pin L/21 Destroyers have slightly different cutouts from the horizontal pin L/21 Destroyers -- apparently from two different sister sets of tooling with a slightly different trimming stamp. But they share the same obverse design which is also shared by many other makers including P&L ("Type 6" as discussed in the classification thread). Different die sets have slight differences in the eagle feathering and I presume F&B ordered two sets (possibly from Paul Wissmann).

        Your horizontal pin badge looks like a typical F&B zincer to me although I'm not quite sure about the obverse finish. But the main interesting point is that it's unmarked. These are almost always stamped "L/21" in the pin and the only other unmarked example I've seen is the one posted here (Tom Y's example I believe). Now that you've found another unmarked example I'll need to add this variant to the classification table.

        I've also attached Lorenzo's marked example of the same type with the same margins.

        Best regards,
        ---Norm
        Attached Files
        Last edited by Norm F; 01-22-2016, 10:11 PM.

        Comment


          #49
          Different trimming stamps Yes, agreed, I was just so excited that I did not take it into consideration. I looked at different eagle, flag pole and guns cut outs which combined with different finish and planchet thickness made me think od another maker
          As far as the finish is concerned I would worry more about the gilt on the marked example than about the gilt and silvering on the unmarked one. I am not sure if comparison to Tom's and Lorenzo's examples is correct since those two we gilded on the reverse not silvered as my two badges and actualy lost their finish.
          My crapy scanner does not do it a justice but silvering and gilt on the obverse on my unmarked F&B corresponds well with the silvering on the reverse. I'll try to take a pictures with my cel phone in natural light condition so you could see it either.
          When I compare that finish with finishes on my F&B Minesweepers then I can see that those badges with silvered reverse maintain their finish better than those with gilded reverse. I enclose my two F&B Minesweepers to illustrate what I mean, type 2.9.4 with gilded reverse and type 2.9.5 with silvered reverse.
          Could you take a second look on that?
          Cheers,
          Hubert
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by BubbaZ View Post
            As far as the finish is concerned I would worry more about the gilt on the marked example than about the gilt and silvering on the unmarked one. I am not sure if comparison to Tom's and Lorenzo's examples is correct since those two we gilded on the reverse not silvered as my two badges and actualy lost their finish.
            My crappy scanner does not do it a justice but silvering and gilt on the obverse on my unmarked F&B corresponds well with the silvering on the reverse. I'll try to take a pictures with my cel phone in natural light condition so you could see it either.
            When I compare that finish with finishes on my F&B Minesweepers then I can see that those badges with silvered reverse maintain their finish better than those with gilded reverse. I enclose my two F&B Minesweepers to illustrate what I mean, type 2.9.4 with gilded reverse and type 2.9.5 with silvered reverse.
            Could you take a second look on that?
            Cheers,
            Hubert
            Hi Hubert,

            You may be right. It's hard to judge the finish on F&B zincers since they show up with a bewildering variety of finishes, most of which are acetone soluble to a degree. It's a struggle to know what's original finish and what might be post-war "refreshment". That's why I was happy to exclude variations in finish from the classification systems.

            Here are two more Minesweepers. The marked one has the same reverse finish as your unmarked Destroyer while the unmarked one is more like your marked Destroyer.

            Best regards,
            ---Norm
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #51
              Hi Guys,
              Here are my recent additions. Both very rare. First is unmarked tombak FLL destroyer badge, type 4.1.2 in the Classification system.
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #52
                And here is my second addition - extremely hard to find unmarked tombak Meybauer destroyer badge, type 6.1.1 in the Classification system. Enjoy!
                Cheers,
                Hubert
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #53
                  A first-class collection!

                  Best regards,
                  —-Norm

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Very Nice

                    Outstanding collection of Destroyer badges. You are still missing the L/53. I know where you can find one if need be.
                    Cheers
                    Steve

                    Comment


                      #55
                      I just looked through!
                      Great collection

                      Kind regards Chay

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Thanks guys

                        Steve, I know Hymmen zincer that is listed on your site, but I try to focus on tombak variants as far as Destroyers and U-boats are concerned.
                        Cheers,
                        Hubert

                        Comment

                        Users Viewing this Thread

                        Collapse

                        There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

                        Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                        Working...
                        X