Dear all,
This is a most unusual Minesweeper that I consider an original though.
"What is so unusual about it?" you may ask. Two things:
-It is a zinker but the slightly worn obverse shows under the silver finish of the explosion even another finish which looks brassy/copperish. Same goes for the wreath, same copperish plating under the gold wash. However on the wrteah the zink shows on the vfery worn highlights. This means that this badge has a brassy/copperish coating over the zink but UNDER the silver and gold washes. I made sure that it is NOT painted, the silver and gold finish you see is definitely original to the badge.
-secondly, the badge is thicker and heavier than the ones from most makers. You can see that clearly in the detail shot from the side. Check the thickness of the "explosion".
The badge has a nice balltype hinge and silver finished back.
Any clues or comments?
Cheers, Frank H.
This is a most unusual Minesweeper that I consider an original though.
"What is so unusual about it?" you may ask. Two things:
-It is a zinker but the slightly worn obverse shows under the silver finish of the explosion even another finish which looks brassy/copperish. Same goes for the wreath, same copperish plating under the gold wash. However on the wrteah the zink shows on the vfery worn highlights. This means that this badge has a brassy/copperish coating over the zink but UNDER the silver and gold washes. I made sure that it is NOT painted, the silver and gold finish you see is definitely original to the badge.
-secondly, the badge is thicker and heavier than the ones from most makers. You can see that clearly in the detail shot from the side. Check the thickness of the "explosion".
The badge has a nice balltype hinge and silver finished back.
Any clues or comments?
Cheers, Frank H.
Comment