WöschlerOrden

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Frank & Reif Stuttgart U-boat badge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by Jody Beltram View Post
    ..."a well made late 20th Century post-war produced reproduction badge based on an early style of U-boat badge from the early 1940's....
    Hmmm. Too much of a mouthful for me Jody. I think I'll abbreviate it to "fake"

    Regards
    Mike
    Last edited by Mike Kenny; 09-15-2007, 08:30 PM.
    Regards
    Mike

    Evaluate the item, not the story and not the seller's reputation!

    If you PM/contact me without the courtesy of using your first name, please don't be offended if I politely ignore you!

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Jody Beltram View Post
      Hello,
      From now on I am going to refer to the Frank & Reif U-boat badge as "a well made late 20th Century post-war produced reproduction badge based on an early style of U-boat badge from the early 1940's."

      Regards,
      Jody

      I love it Jody. The Professor in you is coming out. I am now going to repost the rare donald duck submarine badge that made its appearance late war (meaning after Desert Storm)

      John
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #18
        Donal Duck U-boat

        Originally posted by John Robinson View Post
        I love it Jody. The Professor in you is coming out. I am now going to repost the rare donald duck submarine badge that made its appearance late war (meaning after Desert Storm)

        John
        Hi John,
        IMO, that is a fine example of a post-war produced badge.

        Jody

        Comment


          #19
          The true "angry Donald"

          Don't get hung up on silly terms and definitions,I am with Mike, the badge is a fake.


          Al

          Comment


            #20
            Hi John
            Many thanks for your kind remarks that give me the chance to express in detail what I have said concisely
            Fake : counterfeit, superficially resembling or imitating fraudulently something.
            In these terms we talk of counterfeit Louis Vuitton hand bags , Rolex watches ,...
            F&R has not produced UBadges during the war , therefore the badge we are talking about ha no model to copy and claims a non-existent authorship. In my opinion it is just an oddity as for instance the GAB mm JFS or the Budapest schild.
            Whereas you think that every UBadge produced after 1945 is a fake .
            It is a different viewpoint.
            Speaking of post-war production, I think it a fake , even if imaginary, the UBadge Hymmen design and Schwerin mm as it uses a current mark in war production.
            Well , as to the difference between a fake and the post-war production, Souval is really a matter on which to split hairs.
            Not to go too far and to end a semantic debate ,I think the problem od fakes is a serious one and deserves a close investigation on the techniques capable of tackling it.
            All the best
            giorgio

            PS : in short I said Hymmen design , but I should have said "unknown maker". I apologize to GW
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #21
              ....
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #22
                Well expressed Giorgio. I think we all understand your point now. thanks for posting the Hymenn type fake with the bogus schwerin maker's mark.

                Best wishes, John

                Comment


                  #23
                  A link to this excellent thread was posted as part of a reply to a U Boat Badge that I had posted some time ago. Recently I looked it up again, wondering if I had recollected correctly that Frank and Rief never made these badges, because a prestigious British auction house, specialising in selling Militaria, were selling one as an original.
                  I find it extraordinary that such an auction house, widely regarded as being experts in this type of item could make such an elementary error.
                  What chance for the ordinary collector indeed! I just hope that the purchaser returned it.
                  I think that this forum is a fantastic resource for collectors, and is where the real experts are found. It has certainly saved me from buying several fakes, and I would not even consider collecting this type of item without being a member.
                  I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the experienced collectors who are members, for helping us less experienced ones out.
                  Thanks,
                  Peter Davies

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by genoa41 View Post
                    Hi John
                    Many thanks for your kind remarks that give me the chance to express in detail what I have said concisely
                    Fake : counterfeit, superficially resembling or imitating fraudulently something.
                    In these terms we talk of counterfeit Louis Vuitton hand bags , Rolex watches ,...
                    F&R has not produced UBadges during the war , therefore the badge we are talking about ha no model to copy and claims a non-existent authorship. In my opinion it is just an oddity as for instance the GAB mm JFS or the Budapest schild.
                    Whereas you think that every UBadge produced after 1945 is a fake .
                    It is a different viewpoint.
                    Speaking of post-war production, I think it a fake , even if imaginary, the UBadge Hymmen design and Schwerin mm as it uses a current mark in war production.
                    Well , as to the difference between a fake and the post-war production, Souval is really a matter on which to split hairs.
                    Not to go too far and to end a semantic debate ,I think the problem od fakes is a serious one and deserves a close investigation on the techniques capable of tackling it.
                    All the best
                    giorgio

                    PS : in short I said Hymmen design , but I should have said "unknown maker". I apologize to GW
                    Now known to be based on a Deumer design, not Hymmen. John

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Thanks for that correction John, and for your and other experienced collectors' good work on this forum.
                      Peter

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Well, it took many years to figure out Hymmen vs. Deumer in tombak.

                        Here is a Hymmen
                        Attached Files

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Deumer solid reverse
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Deumer hollow back
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                              #29
                              So the fake Schwerin was based on the beautiful Deumer obverse, but plenty were bought in the early years. John

                              Comment


                                #30
                                At least to my eye based on the Deumer, but maybe based on Hymmen. Either way, with the stamp, it is a fake. John

                                Comment

                                Users Viewing this Thread

                                Collapse

                                There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 8,717 at 11:48 PM on 01-11-2024.

                                Working...
                                X