At first I was told it was a good example. Now there is some doubt. Can someone please shed light on it? Thanks in advance.
-
-
Sorry, I think this is a fake. Stewy -
Soft detailing and the color of the base metal indicates that this is the work of Staegemeir. In other words, a fake IMO.
ChetZinc stinks!Comment
-
Headlights, pin, turret detail stand out for me. Good call for a Staegemeir, Chet
. Stewy
Comment
-
IMO original badge !Comment
-
Can somebody please post picture of known Staegemeir example for comparison ?Comment
-
I see nothing wrong with this badge at all.....and these are my favorites.Comment
-
Now what is your opinion on this one ?Comment
-
I like the badge posted
I think better pictures of the first badge will make a huge difference
Last edited by jlga; 06-16-2016, 06:01 PM.Comment
-
Its the same badge , just better pictureOriginally posted by jlga View PostI like the badge posted I think better pictures of the first badge will make a huge difference
And its 100% original ,was posted on waf couple years ago with all positive opinion!Comment
-
This is a reproduction for me as well.
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
I just found this old post it's the same badge I purchase from the seller
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...ht=Wurster+PABComment
-
Straight on photos posted on another page. Same badge. Leaf which has the stems which determine the type of Wurster is a Die 2. I searched through several and have only found these KWM marked Wursters with Die 3 stems. The other things I see are the soft almost gone on the two lower left leaves. Combining that with the soft details showing better with these two photos, the odd finish and lack of that characteristic, though not definitive, bubbling it's just not one I would be comfortable with.Comment
-
-
Thanks, this thread is so confusing that I did not realise that, if that is the case, just will continue researching on this one, still like it, regards, JuanOriginally posted by chahler View PostComment
Comment