Bronze PAB

[Sniper 1987]

This one looked good in photos, then I got it in hand for a close inspection. Also, I checked some recent threads and quickly got a very bad feeling. I have owned a silver "AS in triangle" PAB previously, and this one does not compare favorably. The base material may be copper alloy instead of zinc, and I believe the catch is different than known originals. Measurements are 32.1 grams, 63.1 mm high, and 42.9 mm wide. Need the experts to confirm my suspicions. Thanks.

Matt

[Sniper 1987]

Reverse close-ups.

[Thomas Durante]

Hi Matt,

Another dud my friend, very crappy detail compared with originals. Also weird base metal. Its not an exact copy of any original "AS in Triangle", so I don't think its a casting but rather just a poor copy that tries to come close to the original design.

Tom

[Sniper 1987]

Crap, Tom - have I finally been "Staegemeired"? I guess it was only a matter of time. This one, and it's "EWE" mate, will be going back. Thanks.

Matt

[Sniper 1987]

On closer inspection with a loupe, the obverse does have some worn spots where the base metal is exposed - it is a silver/gray color. However, the largest "worn" spot is a recessed area where there would normally be no wear at all. This is another red flag on top of all the other issues mentioned above. I just wanted to correct my previous post and clarify that the base metal does NOT appear to be a copper alloy. Just an FYI for other collectors to watch out for in the future. Hope my mistake educates others. Thanks.

Matt