Wiedemann PAB

[rove]

Hello

For me ok,

although the angle is bad.

greetings

[scott3000]

Another Bad one

[Levesque]

I would pass on this one too if these are the only pictures that you have.
Dan

[eraser]

Yes a straight on picture of the front and back would help

[Gabor Tischler]

Please post better pics from the full frontside and form the backside. This one same, as you can see in the PAB book 508-509. pages ( "Classic" Set-up ).

Regards,
Gabor

[rove]

hhm, i got the pics from a friend. i already asked him for better pics.

greetings!

[Aiceman]

Yes,must picture from eagle head,and from the hinge.
I see little different in the rock area in front side.

[rbminis]

I do not like what I see on the reverse, looks to me like a bad casting.

[Gabor Tischler]

Yes, I seen those forms, but please see these pictures from the book.......

Best regards,
Gabor

[rove]

pabs

here pics of both

the wiedemann is the same as in the book, IMO

[eraser]

In that picture i think its good.Typical setup for this maker and the pab of this maker is often seen with a bit slobby finished backside

[Aiceman]

I do not like what I see on the reverse, looks to me like a bad casting.

Low finishing can be found in Wiedmann's reverse side.I think it's no problem. I like the eagle head too. I think this badge ok . The little differences in the front side-maybe worn.

[Nordmark]

I would not buy this piece. These are not that rare, I would wait for one without any doubts.




Daniel

[rbminis]

here pics of both

the wiedemann is the same as in the book, IMO

Agreed!

[12thPanzer]

I personally didnt like it in the first pictures. Medal used looks odd IMO. But in the second photo it looks alright. just goes to show how a good picture is needed for a clear determination