I know these aren't good pics but they are all I have at the moment. Does this badge look OK from what these show. I'll try for better ones . Comments appreciated.
-
-
I'm sorry, but this is a bad fake
Jacek -
Hi Nutmeg
......You will not need to get any more images. This GAB is a out-and-out FAKE. The big giveaways are: rivets(very bad), the catch(atrocious) and the manufacturer's mark(totally incorrect).
Comment
-
Bad as bad can be! Nothing in common with a genuine badge.Comment
-
Thanks guys, I suspected as much but wanted to be certain. These are not my area.Comment
-
A real one to compare...
....RonRComment
-
As everyone has said fake. Big give away is that post war catch.
JohnComment
-
Ron, I can't stand it anymore to look at your jewels
Kind regards,
Giel
Check out our Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Giels-Milit...5292741243193/Comment
-
Twin brother to Ron’s.
Gary BANA LM #1201868, OMSA LM #60, OVMS LM #8348Comment
-
-
Not that you would need to look at the catch - there is nothing right about that badge.Originally posted by Medals45 View PostComment
-
now triplets : )
JacekComment
-
Originally posted by Bruce Simcox View Post......You will not need to get any more images. This GAB is a out-and-out FAKE. The big giveaways are: rivets(very bad), the catch(atrocious) and the manufacturer's mark(totally incorrect).
AGREED, really easy fake.
TomIf it doesn't have a hinge and catch, I'm not interested......well, maybe a littleNew Book - The German Close Combat Clasp of World War II
[/SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Available Now - tmdurante@gmail.com
Comment
-
All nice numbers GABs....except the one that started the post.
Gary BANA LM #1201868, OMSA LM #60, OVMS LM #8348Comment
-
First one is a horrible fake but those others… I don't like zinc but if I look at some of those badges
Regards, WimFreedom is not for FreeComment
Comment