Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_03ffef13c4591b4cee43aa3865f2a1f46a2b9e479c5a122c, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 2 x German Social Welfare Cross Third Class - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Vintage Productions

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2 x German Social Welfare Cross Third Class

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    2 x German Social Welfare Cross Third Class

    Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
    Attached Files

    #2
    om58 - close up eagle

    Originally posted by torstenbel
    Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      om58 - reverse

      Originally posted by torstenbel
      Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        om59 - obverse with band

        Originally posted by torstenbel
        Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          om59 - cross


          Originally posted by torstenbel
          Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #6
            om59 - eagle at angle

            Originally posted by torstenbel
            Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              om59 - reverse

              Originally posted by torstenbel
              Hi Guys, as far as I am concerned both crosses that I have got here are good, but I would really appreciate your opinions and comments please.... Thank you very much in advance for all your opinions. Please feel free to ask me for more photos or other info....Cheers, Torsten.
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #8
                Hi Torsten the first award i would say. As you would expect to see, the second has me a little suspicious, very thin swaz, eagles feet seem poorly defined (unless of course its the pics) and the markings on the eagle. Why dont you try posting pics in the politics award forum. You may get a better resonse. Do hope im wrong on the second but it seems a close call. All the best

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by mrg
                  Hi Torsten the first award i would say. As you would expect to see, the second has me a little suspicious, very thin swaz, eagles feet seem poorly defined (unless of course its the pics) and the markings on the eagle. Why dont you try posting pics in the politics award forum. You may get a better resonse. Do hope im wrong on the second but it seems a close call. All the best
                  You are right, the swastika on the second one is a little thinner...but it appears to be of better quality and craftmanship than the first one and so, I would hope that it is still a good one??...I am very certain about the first one being a good one, as it 100% matches other reference examples I have seen...does anyone know if there were variations between different makers of these crosses? Cheers, Torsten.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Hi Torsten that can sometimes be a bad sign for these awards. Fakes that i have seen have a more plastic looking white enamel surface and the black is much brighter and more intense. As for variations Im not sure. Maybe someone else can help. I have not encountered any. Allthe best

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by mrg
                      Hi Torsten that can sometimes be a bad sign for these awards. Fakes that i have seen have a more plastic looking white enamel surface and the black is much brighter and more intense. As for variations Im not sure. Maybe someone else can help. I have not encountered any. Allthe best
                      Hiya, actually the white enamel looks identical on both crosses I have got...I have got them in front of me right now and if I was only to look at the white enamel, I would not be able to tell which one is which... the beak on the second eagle is more pronounced than on the first one, the feet are as detailed on both, if not than they are a little more detailed on the second one, the legs on the second one are longer than on the first one and so on...I could still list more small differences between the two....whatever they are, they certainly do not come from the same maker...but, if the second one does turn out to be a fake, than it would be an extremely close call I would say.... Cheers, Torsten.

                      Comment

                      Users Viewing this Thread

                      Collapse

                      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                      Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                      Working...
                      X