Fallschirm.Jg Dog Tag

[Joda]

Any feedback is well apreciated!

Thanks in advance,

Joda

[Joda]

opinions?

[fox-terier]

62590 - 1./ Fsch.Kraftf.Ausb.Abt., Helmstedt

But I don't like this one.

Regards

[Joda]

Here are two new picts with natural light.

Opinions?

[Joda]

...

[Joda]

last.

[Joda]

[Joda]

[fox-terier]

Hi Joda,
Looking on your new photos you ID looks better than earlier.

But ...

I have 2 dog tags from Fsch.Kraftf.Ausb.Abt (2./ an 3./ Kp.) Both have the same digit's cut.
Your dog tag digits looks completely different. Of course 1. Kp. could use a different pattern but I still have doubts.

Regards

[Joda]

Hi Joda,
Looking on your new photos you ID looks better than earlier.

But ...

I have 2 dog tags from Fsch.Kraftf.Ausb.Abt (2./ an 3./ Kp.) Both have the same digit's cut.
Your dog tag digits looks completely different. Of course 1. Kp. could use a different pattern but I still have doubts.

Regards

Thank you for your reply!

I understand what you mean: but as you say another company could have a different digit dies.. who knows?

But I would focus the attention to the tag itself:
- does it look ok even if numbers are different?
- is the metal itself found usually on wartime tags?
- surely it is not a cast tag
- are the holes and inner cuts correct for an original tag?

Thanks for the help!
Joda

[fox-terier]

The dog tag (metal) is original. Digits - is difficult to say.

[Joda]

Thanks!
So you have doubts on digits because different from your two ones, belonging to the same unit but different companies, correct?

[fox-terier]

Thanks!
So you have doubts on digits because different from your two ones, belonging to the same unit but different companies, correct?

Correct !

[Joda]

Correct !

Many thanks for your time