I can't tell if this is "Hattenbaum" or "Gattenbaum" ( looks more like Hattenbaum to me, what do you guys think? )
This man was in communications, and went from the N.Z. of 22 I.R. to the FIK, back to the 22 I.R, and then to the Nach.Zg. of the FIB.
What I find interesting about this book is the service/battle page.
It seems to me the book is indicating service at the Albert Canals.
I wonder if this could be a mistake , or because of his specialty, and because he was not attached to the N.Z of II./FJR1 ( as of 6.20.39 just N.Z./FJR1 ( and Sturmabteilung KOCH was known as
17./FJR1 ) if he could have actually been temporarily assigned to this unit and participated in the attacks on one of the bridges at the Albert Canals as part of Eisen, Beton or Stahl.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
EQ
This man was in communications, and went from the N.Z. of 22 I.R. to the FIK, back to the 22 I.R, and then to the Nach.Zg. of the FIB.
What I find interesting about this book is the service/battle page.
It seems to me the book is indicating service at the Albert Canals.
I wonder if this could be a mistake , or because of his specialty, and because he was not attached to the N.Z of II./FJR1 ( as of 6.20.39 just N.Z./FJR1 ( and Sturmabteilung KOCH was known as
17./FJR1 ) if he could have actually been temporarily assigned to this unit and participated in the attacks on one of the bridges at the Albert Canals as part of Eisen, Beton or Stahl.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
EQ
Comment