need help with these EK2 ... JUNCKER??

[pep]

as I've heard about some variants concerning juncker second class crosses and I've not had the chance to have a good look on every type, will like to be sure if these are or are not from this maker

first one, I'm afraid it's NOT ...

[Thomas E Hansen]

It’s a deschler.

[pep]

concerning the second one, my guess is that IT'S a juncker.

[pep]

I know that they are not the best pics concerning the second one. but, it's all I got. sorry.

[Robert P.]

Yes, and IMO its a nicely marked ('L/12)' 3-flaw -framed Juncker. Its a very nice example of the '3-flawed' frame in that all three of the flaws are at a very early stage in die evolution. I think this is a tremendous example.

And, I agree with Thomas, the first cross is a nice Deschler. Its ring is probably stamped ('1').

Robert

[jigmaster63]

that first one is indeed a Deschler. Classic Deschler

as for the second one......what Robert said......

[pep]

Yes, and IMO its a nicely marked ('L/12)' 3-flaw -framed Juncker. Its a very nice example of the '3-flawed' frame in that all three of the flaws are at a very early stage in die evolution. I think this is a tremendous example.

oops! ... nice to read that. and which could be its price?

[kid74]

No doubts - Deschler!

WR Kirill

[Hank C.]

It’s a deschler.

Agree, typical Deschler

[Douglas 5]

First one mid weight Deschler - is it marked ?
Second cross - first 3 flaw Juncker production die with the smaller flaws .
L/12s are hard to find and pricy .

Douglas

[pep]

I don't know if deschler is marked. only have the pics.

I go for the second one.

thanks for your help

[leba75]

I don't know if deschler is marked. only have the pics.

I go for the second one.

thanks for your help

First - definitely Deschler.
Second - if it's yours - congratulations!. Beautiful Juncker

[pep]

as not an expert on ek2, can you post some pics to show where are located those 3 flaws??
thanks for your cooperation

[Douglas 5]

Here are the 3 flaws .

Douglas

[pep]

Thanks a bunch !!