can you help me with the determination of the maker ? there is no maker mark in the ring and i a no expert
-
-
Photos aren't great, but I'd venture S&L.
Best
HUnless it was nighttime, or the weather was bad, and you were running out of gas - then it was a sweaty nightmare, like a monkey f*ing a skunk.
~ Dan Hampton, Viper Pilot -
Rotated pictures :
DouglasComment
-
the pictures not the best ,because very vague,but IMO this is a W&H with two flawsComment
-
IMO it could be early Wiedmann.
Regards
JarekComment
-
as promised i have some extra picturesComment
-
Any opinions with these extra pictures ? i have 3 differend comments with te bad pictures so hope we can find out the correct one ;-)Comment
-
hi there ,
can anyone tell me what the maker is
some people say s&l
some saye w&h
and some wiedmann
thanks , bjorn .Comment
-
Walter and henleinComment
-
Going by the flaw in this corner I would go with W&H .
I have not seen this on Wiedmann crosses .
DouglasComment
-
Frames of Wiedmann's (= 19) crosses EK2-1939 and crosses W&H (= 109) are very similar and hence in my opinion many mistakes in recognizing unsigned Wiedmann's crosses EK2.
Attached is a comparison of Wiedmann's frames of crosses signed and non-signed.
The W&H frame also has similar flaws, but the Wiedmann's frame has no flaw at the top of the right frame arm.
Regards
JarekLast edited by boch_62; 01-30-2020, 07:17 AM.Comment
-
IMO a w&h type yet always ,exist more different flaw types with 1 ,with 2 with 3 and without flaws ect...Comment
-
I am not going to convince anyoneOriginally posted by sanya13 View Post
I devoted a lot of time to this problem, with dozens of crosses marked "19" in my hands. I compared them with the W&H crosses and the conclusion was clear. But of course it's just IMO
Regards
JarekComment
Comment