EK1 opinions please!

[tinmantis]

A bit of a quiz for you guys:
what are your thoughts on this reverse? seen this set-up before? maker?

(there's a reason for this madness!)
regards
jon

[tinmantis]

2

[tinmantis]

3

[tinmantis]

last pic:

[Peter Wiking]

Looks like a Deumer.

Cheers.
Peter

[Marc Garlasco]

Textbook Deumer...

[Darrell]

I sense a trick or twist coming

[robert60446]

I say nothing!<o =""></o>

[tinmantis]

thanks guys, a much more positive response then I expected!
anyone have a Deumer reverse on hand to post quick?
regards
jon

[robert60446]

thanks guys, a much more positive response then I expected!
anyone have a Deumer reverse on hand to post quick?
regards
jon

Nope, but try here: http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/iron...rers/3/1/3.htm
Looks identical to me! May I ask where you going with this?<o =""></o>

[Darrell]

1914 EK1 or maybe 1957 EK1?

[robert60446]

1914 EK1 or maybe 1957 EK1?

Common Jon, stop torturing us! What you up to?<o =""></o>

[tinmantis]

yes it's a '57. I thought it looked rather TR, but couldn't convince myself until someon un-biased took a look!
A Deumer '57! Is that common? I'm not very wise with the makers of '57's
thanks for the help
jon

[Peter Wiking]

Deumer made 1957 crosses using wartime parts. Interesting with that vaulting.

Cheers.
Peter

[tinmantis]

thanks all,
Peter, most likely slightly bent rather than vaulted... and with all this talk about S+L of late, wouldn't Deumer make up 'nazi' crosses post '45 if they obviously had alot of left over bits...?
regards
jon