L/4 EK II Spange for review

[Gary Symonds]

I can only agree with this statement.

Gary, where is the evidence L/4s are original? The onus is to prove something is original, not the other way around. You cannot prove a negative. You have to prove originality, not prove it is fake.

Tom

Maybe I was misunderstood.

The only question I had was that the spange was deemed a Repro based on the fact that it was a L number below L/10, and based on that and nothing more it was a fake.

I am merely seeking evidence to support the contention that all badges with these low L numbers are automatically fake.

I have no opinion on the L/4 spange, on its merits.