demjanskbattlefield

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ek2 mm 137

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    ek2 mm 137

    Hi.
    Below I present my new cross signed with 137. It is not a block number [137].
    What's interesting - in the book M.Alt there are shown two types of sign 137. (page 270).
    What do you think about him?
    greetings
    Maciej
    Attached Files

    #2
    more pics
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      IMO cross looks good as a correct Werner's.
      I admit that personally, I have never seen the "punc" signature "137", they were always "block" signatures [137].

      It turns out that we can still discover something new and interesting in crosses EK2-1939. Congratulations.

      Regards
      Jarek

      Comment


        #4
        Thank you very much, Jarek for the opinion
        greetings
        Maciej

        Comment


          #5
          I have never seen the "punc" signature "137".

          WR Kirill

          Comment


            #6
            This is one from my collection as a comparison with block type 137 -hope the pics help.
            Troy
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              I have not seen one before.
              Now I know that they exist. A few such items are already known to me.

              Comment


                #8
                also possible that somebody identified good Werner and just added!

                I saw similiar cases in past!

                or

                Maybe we have a new type of maker's mark!

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Yubari View Post
                  also possible that somebody identified good Werner and just added!

                  I saw similiar cases in past!

                  or

                  Maybe we have a new type of maker's mark!
                  thank you for helping Yubari. Now I know that

                  it is a copy
                  or
                  it is the original

                  Comment


                    #10
                    IMO the mm original , but the cross not the ordinary
                    round inner frame ( but not full similarity ), but IMO the pattern OK
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                      #11
                      thank you Sanya

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Interesting we have two marking types .
                        The block type is more finicky for being absolute level and number plugging .

                        Douglas

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Hí Maciej

                          now found a such type mm 137 cross
                          the condition not the best but the mm same ( unfortunately the mm have on the sodering )

                          but on this the piece ,the frame type total same that on the regular type ( with rounded inner frame )
                          but than said the condition unfortunately not the best .
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                            #14
                            A nice cross

                            regards
                            Maciej

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Your cross better,this the piece will sale ,my friend?QUOTE=Eryk;8402325]A nice cross

                              regards
                              Maciej[/QUOTE]

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X