thank you for your opinion!
-
-
Had a better look at this one .
Unm Rettenmaier EK2 .... found the flaw .
Douglas -
Are you sure? If so it is amazing how good eyes you have.
Comment
-
Douglas is right.
Regards
JarekComment
-
thank you for confirming!Comment
-
On the back side have a typical W&H flaw , IMO this is a W&H typeLast edited by sanya13; 08-17-2018, 05:08 AM.Comment
-
Hi SanyaOriginally posted by sanya13 View Post
Maybe you are right, maybe not
, but such a flaw (or a very similar flaw) we meet in this place of frame, in EK2 crosses of several manufacturers: W&H, Rettenmaier's, Wiedmann's or Brehmer's ... IMO this particular flaw alone is not decisive in recognizing the producer. But this is only by the way and only IMO
Regards
JarekComment
-
anyone can please show his or her version of Rettenmaier with piedestal, please?Last edited by Yubari; 09-16-2018, 01:41 PM.Comment
-
In this case I stand corrected .
Jerek has a good point - more than one maker has similar looking flaws in that area .
Sanya suggestion is correct ..... we are actually looking at a W&H cross .
One side does not have that small flaw as the other side does . We have mixed production frames here .
Look/compare closely the 2 halves - one side has very few flaws as the other half has badly cracked top beading .
Just switching from one production die to a new one .... unavoidable not to find such mixed frames .- see comparison .
Rettenmaier does not have that bad top bead cracking .
DouglasComment
-
Thank you for providing such valuable information. So in this case we can say we have three um, 109 crosses types?
Standard frame, #frame and mixed frame?Comment
-
Very nice! Tom
Comment
Comment