EK2 1939: who is the Maker?

[valsente]

Hello guys,
I need your opinion about this cross.
Thanks in advance
Val

[boch_62]

IMO looks like W&H (=109) with "#" type of frame.

Regards
Jarek

[valsente]

Thanks a lot Jarek
Val

[kid74]

Bad pictures. This could be a cast copy. Check that the core is separate.

WR Kirill

[valsente]

Bad pictures. This could be a cast copy. Check that the core is separate.

WR Kirill

Yes, it is separate.

[kid74]

IMO looks like W&H (=109) with "#" type of frame.

Regards
Jarek

then +1 )

WR Kirill

[Yubari]

I agree with Jarek, it looks as 109! Even from these pictures it can be seen it is not a copy.

[Rob Appleyard]

I agree with W&H (109), it even has the W&H flaw on the 3 0`clock high arm.