EK 2 - Good or Bad?

[militbuff]

I just happened upon this EK2 today (along with the other one I'm showing) in a box with a bunch of German items, some good and some bad, that I had put away a while back. It has a number 128 and it's non-magnetic..

Is this EK good? Why is the black missing from the body?

[militbuff]

Here's a pic of the back.

[Yubari]

yes that is very good cross, I have exactly same condition from that Czech maker.
Will you consider selling it? I am EK2 addicted and would love to have two same condition crosses from same maker.

[Stepdale]

yes that is very good cross, I have exactly same condition from that Czech maker.
Will you consider selling it? I am EK2 addicted and would love to have two same condition crosses from same maker.

Why do you say it's a Czech maker? By what I can find, Jablonski was based in Posen, currently known as Poznan in Poland.
Dale

[Yubari]

I ment Polish ;-)

[Stepdale]

There for a moment I got excited and thought there had been a new discovery making it a Gablonz product. I don't need to add any more things to my list!
Dale

[boch_62]

For me cross looks o.k. but I have problem with him.
Jablonski had no no-magnetic crosses EK2-1939, only magnetic. IMO. Unless I'm wrong?

Regards
Jarek

[militbuff]

Up for sale now on estand. See this link (http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...24#post8174224)