L/12 Junker EK2 Spange

[Sterling]

All, What are your thoughts on originality of this L/12 marked ek2 spange. I am concerned about the derail in the head and talons. Thoughts?

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk

[Jean-Claude]

Hi Sterling,

Wait for better opinions but sorry to say your L/12 spange looks more like a Deumer than a Juncker to me. Not sure if its a good unmarked spange that has been stamped with a fake MM or if its an outright repro

Regards

JC

[Nydigger1]

Its the same spange from this thread which has a bit clearer photos which was approved as good (without looking at the back). Stamp was added post war to increase value.:

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=933957

[Nydigger1]

A few more photos, same spange.

[CMSgt]

spange

Its the same spange from this thread which has a bit clearer photos which was approved as good (without looking at the back). Stamp was added post war to increase value.:

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=933957

Sorry it is a definitely not a Juncker. Jim

[Nydigger1]

Spange itself is an unmarked L/56, Funcke & Bruninghaus. Mark was added post war to increase value.

[ben bijker]

I have had some of these in my hands, marked L/12 and L/11.

They are not original.
Very well made, but not original.

[jcwater]

[ben bijker]

Now THAT is a nice original!