Ek2

[paul w]

Can I have some opinions please on the maker of this unmarked ek2,cheers,

Paul

[paul w]

Ek2

Back.

[paul w]

Ek2

No opinions guys?Original? Fake? Maker?All comments appreciated as I'd like to put this on the e-stand with a '65' I'm putting up for sale,cheers,

Paul

[franki]

I have the dim feeling that the cross does not be made pre may 1945.
The swastika have a ugly appeareance.

Best Franki

[paul w]

Ek2

Thanks for the reply Franki,anyone else expand on that?

[Flemming]

I do not like the rim, and I also think that the swaz looks a bit odd.

I would not buy it, But wait until some of the more experinced collectors have given their opinion.

Best regards
Flemming

[StefanK.]

No problems with that cross but i cannot tell the maker....

[paul w]

Ek2

Thanks for the comments guys,a split decision!Anyone else care to have a stab at this one!Cheers,

Paul

[mr. triatic]

if it wasnt for the flash reflected in the cross.. with better pics it would be easier..
but i do like the appearence of this cross, the fact that the swaz looks a little tiny is due to the flash.. hence the shadows are all gone..
the rim is too bright to see clearly, but looks ok, but somewhat harsch.. looks like a maker "7" to me..

hey, i´m no expert so i might be wrong here..!

[StefanK.]

its not a "7" at all...

[paul w]

Ek2

Thanks for all the comments lads,but I've had a look under magnification and come to the conclusion its a bad 'un.Look at these pics of the dates.The 1939 doesn't look to bad but the serif on the '3' on the 1813 seems to be detached.

[paul w]

Ek2

1813.

[StefanK.]

what is wrong with that "3"?