EK2 opinion please

[paracelso]

Please, I would like your opinion about this EK2. The measurements are somewhat higher than normal (44 mm) but is smaller in size than an "übergrösse"
weight: 24,7 g, and are marked with the number "65" although it seems a mark after the IIGM.
However it seems a Deschler and is less


URL=https://imageshack.com/i/pmuSrIETj][/URL]

[boch_62]

Why do not You give pictures of the reverse of this cross?


Regards
Jarek

[paracelso]

OK

[Dansson]

Cross is an original Deschler & Sohn, but has a fake 65 mark.

[kid74]

Cross is an original Deschler & Sohn, but has a fake 65 mark.

+1

WR Kirill

[leandrods]

Does this EK1 match this case?

Hello, I would like to have your opinion about this medal and, above all, its box.
My query is not about the authenticity of the medal, I think it is, my real question is about the box and if it is the corresponding one according to the marking of the medal.
The medal is marked with L/11 (Wilhelm Deumer), but the box seems to be more typical of the manufacturer L/19 (Ferdinand Hoffstatter). I found some photos on websites, where similar boxes to mine are sold with matching EK1 L/11, but just a few.
Is the box real?
Is the one corresponding to the L/11 marked? Is it a less usual variant?
Thank you.

[Douglas 5]

That is what it looks like .

Douglas

[paracelso]

.thnks for your opinions
Regards


PAracelso

[boch_62]

Cross is an original Deschler & Sohn, but has a fake 65 mark.

Deschler too

Regards
Jarek