EK II "15" for review

[peterm]

Hi guys!

Latest addititon: a "15" (Orth, Vienna) - EK II.

Any comments welcome,

kind regards,

Peter

[peterm]

.

[peterm]

..

[boch_62]

IMO nice and good Orth (=15)

Regards
Jarek

[Dansson]

I agree with Jarek

[peterm]

Thanks, guys!

Best, Peter

[juoneen]

Really??

Gollee I would have thought it was 75, with the way it looks , not 15. Aren't the German letter ones with a more angled down end than the way this first numbers is parallel with the ground?

[boch_62]

Gollee I would have thought it was 75, with the way it looks , not 15. Aren't the German letter ones with a more angled down end than the way this first numbers is parallel with the ground?

Sorry, but the Orth's cross EK2 has nothing in common (or any likeness) with the cross "75" (unknown manufacturer)

Jarek

[peterm]

Gollee I would have thought it was 75, with the way it looks , not 15. Aren't the German letter ones with a more angled down end than the way this first numbers is parallel with the ground?

Hi!

Take a look at the marking of an EK I by "Orth". It's a "15" for sure.

Best, Peter

[boch_62]

We are talking about the manufacturer of the cross EK2.
About this, who is the manufacturer of the cross not getting signature (although in this case is the most correct = 15), but the "construction" of the cross - the appearance of the frame, the core and the rings.
And on this issue we can merits discuss, not the appearance digits of signature. Sorry

Regards
Jarek

[peterm]

Jarek, I posted for member juoneen concerning the "look" of German cyphers "1" and "7"...

Best, Peter

[boch_62]

Jarek, I posted for member juoneen concerning the "look" of German cyphers "1" and "7"...

Best, Peter

I also posted for member juoneen