Struggling with UM EK2

[Tor]

I can't find a reference in my archive on this one. I'm still missing a few to be able to compare against known producers. But I thought this one was one I had pictures of. But no. Any clue?





Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Hank C.]

Perhaps Godet, or C.F. Zimmerman? Based on the style of the "3" in the 1939.

best
Hank

[Eryk]

I think it's O. Schickle - core type 2.
Magnetic or non-magnetic?

best regards
Maciej

[J0hnny]

I agree with Maciej.
This core is nonmagnetic and brass. It is hard to find.

[Dansson]

Yup,
It's a nice brasscored Schickle!

[Tor]

Thank you guys!

[sanya13]

Hí guys
this is a Otto Schickle and I agree too ,but this the piece IMO not brass inner core, because this only a primer coat on the iron core.

If you try, see It will be a magnetic the inner core (IMO)
Otto Schickle not make brass core

here is my piece , good see that very similar color ,but only coating

[boch_62]

Hi Sanya,

Schickle made crosses EK2-1939 with a core of type 1 and type 2.
Both of these crosses have a core magnetic (iron) or non-magnetic.
According to you, of which (stuff) were made non-magnetic cores ?

Regards
Jarek

[sanya13]

Hí Jarek
yes of course Jarek you right ,but Schickle non magnetic core inner core made zink and not brass.
And really was two different date variation on the back side

Hi Sanya,

Schickle made crosses EK2-1939 with a core of type 1 and type 2.
Both of these crosses have a core magnetic (iron) or non-magnetic.
According to you, of which (stuff) were made non-magnetic cores ?

Regards
Jarek