New W&L EK2

[TerryG]

Yup-

It looks like the same flaw on the "3". Terry, do you see that small flaw on the "1" of the "1813" as well on your cross?

Yes although it cannot be seen on my photo, it is there.

[Jim Baker]

Dave,

You done good!!

This is a really beautiful cross. Wish I could find things like this at the antique stores here!! Really nice.

[Dave-B]

Here is the 1813 date of another of my 100's,it doesn't have a fault to the 1 but it might have a slight one to the 3.The 3 is cut at an angle but I don't think it is as sharp as the first one I posted.


Cheers to everyone for the great comments!


Dave

[Dave-B]

Obv of the cross.


Dave

[George Stimson]

Here's mine.

[Deutschland]

Hi Tom.I have also a EK2 by W&L(with a little hump).It has no fault to the 1 and 3 of "1813".I am a rookie.I had ever recourse to the experts in the Forum.They told me,that it is a good one.

[tom hansen]

EK2s are not my main interest. However, there does appear to be two distinct types of wachtler and lange EK2s, one with the "globs" in the "1" and the "3", and one without.