EK II - Opinions

[The Dragon]

Hi,

I'm trying to get a friend to join the WAF as he has an interest in collecting. Unfortunately he has bought the wrong gear before in the past so I am posting a few items for review on his behalf.

Thank you all in advance.

[The Dragon]

01

[The Dragon]

02

[The Dragon]

03

[Paolo67]

EK looks fine to me. Not sure about the packet and document, though.

[Hank C.]

I think doc & EK look good. Not sure about the EK packet.

Hank

[streptile]

I think we need better photos of the cross and the packet, front and back.

[sanya13]

I agree with Trevor ,need better and sharper pictures of the cross ,because this the pictures very vague and this the piece very similar the so called "Stuttgart fake"
IMO the packet is ,not good ,but need the back plate

[boch_62]

and...

[boch_62]

IMO it's fake, the so-called "frame with rounded angles" ...

Regards
Jarek

[Gew44]

I think, from new pictures, the cross is fake and also the EK Document because the signature is not of Generalleutnant Hoffman chief during the period.

[Paolo67]

I Agree.... Looked ok to me, but upon closer inspection, it is a fake.

[Hank C.]

I Agree.... Looked ok to me, but upon closer inspection, it is a fake.

True. Must change my opinion too. Still on the fence about the doc....the lack of a unit (which happens from time to time, but is the exception rather than the rule) is a bit troubling.

Hank

[kid74]

imo it's fake, the so-called "frame with rounded angles" ...

Regards
jarek

+1

[Green]

IMO the ribbon is also not an original!

05.JPG

Looped and not looped side of a fake ribbon.jpg