Yes Kirill I have a few that have filed inside corners . When I posted mine - I never got an answer on it at all . Torn between them being a S&L or 24 ???
They are all very early crosses and quit hard to find . What size and weight is yours ?
Yes Kirill I have a few that have filed inside corners . When I posted mine - I never got an answer on it at all . Torn between them being a S&L or 24 ???
They are all very early crosses and quit hard to find . What size and weight is yours ?
Douglas
Douglas, thanks for the comment! This cross isn't mine, met it on the Internet and it interested me with its uniqueness.
Yes I would say 122 frame is similar, but at the same time the frame is not exactly IMO the same. For example the point where the jumpring is soldered on the 122 there is a small hump but not exatly the size of a lug, this is what I remember that my 122 has on it. Can't confirm this because I have sold mine, would be great if someone could make a photo to confirm this or to dump what I am claiming.
On other detail I noticed on a 122 is the size of the jumpring, it's quite small and from the pics of the 24 it looks like the jumpring is a bit bigger
hí all
Daniel is right the 122 isso called the hump although not
all on the types because exist such type too that not the hump .
The jumpring size too be different ,
,but
IMO this the piece a unmarked 24 ,but jarek is right very similar (a little ) but the inner core different
Kirill please the size this the piece ,if possible
Comment