Opinions needed on a RK

[Carthin]

So I have found this RK for sale in rather unusual location that I don't normally buy militaria from. Any ideas if it's actually an original? What would be a fair price if it turns out to be real?

[Carthin]

Backside of the RK

[Thomas E Hansen]

Better photos??

[Thomas E Hansen]

Do you got photo of the loop marking?

[Carthin]

Hoop pictures (both hoop and frame marked 800)

[Carthin]

I just posted a picture of some of the hoop markings, but I can't do much more picture-wise as its a online listing with a pretty major language barrier.

[Thomas E Hansen]

I'm not I love with the round corner and the roundings on the swastica.

[Thomas E Hansen]

But wait for the others.

[Tom B]

It's a fake !!

[Tony T-S]

Agreed. Doesn't match anything in the data base. Even if the frame was okay the Swaz is not

[Tom B]

Yes, I've seen these before. the frame is pretty decent. don't know how log they have been around, but several years.

[kraut72]

fake with new creation swas..

[mwl]

It´s a Sedlatzek fake, isn´t it?
Wonder,
Mats

[Tony T-S]

The rounded ends to the swaz suggest not, but we really need good close front on shots to get a proper idea

[Schickle93]

It's no Sedlatzek cross. But I am sure that's a C-Frame from S&L. On the other hand the core doesn't match with the "usual" S&L postwar cores. Especially the "1939" seems to be different.