EKII 1939 W&L mm L/12

[Gew44]

Hi to everybody,
what are your opinions about the cross like a title.

Is a good Juncker or maybe not ??

Thanks a lot

Regards

[streptile]

I believe these crosses do exist and are period. The ones I've seen are marked L/12 on the ring, unlike Juncker-framed LDO EK2s which are marked on the frame. Of course without a photo it's not possible to judge a specific cross.

[boch_62]

I believe these crosses do exist and are period. The ones I've seen are marked L/12 on the ring, unlike Juncker-framed LDO EK2s which are marked on the frame. Of course without a photo it's not possible to judge a specific cross.

I fully agree.

Regards
Jarek

[schönbeck]

Have one of those as well. The ring is frosted and the mark is under the frosting.

[boch_62]

It is extremely rare crosses.

Jarek

[Douglas 5]

Love it !

Douglas

[Gew44]

Here the pics.
IMO is a Juncker frame and W&L Core.

Thanks a lot

[Gew44]

a1

[Gew44]

A2

[sanya13]

IMO mm look good to me

[streptile]

Here the pics.
IMO is a Juncker frame and W&L Core.

Saw that one too. It's a full W&L (frame and core). But that doesn't mean the mark is bad. I'd just want to see a straight-on pic of the mark, or see it in my hands.

[boch_62]

Sorry, I do not know - I have doubts ...
I'm sorry for not nice bars - but everyone knows what's going on ...

Jarek

[sanya13]

Jarek is right ,Now so it can better views ,the mm very similar ,but not 100%
exist such type mm bur the "L" lower arm too short

and "/" little more oblique and the numbers distance greater

here are my two such type marked mark

[Douglas 5]

I do not like the mark and it is not a match .

Douglas

[Douglas 5]

It looks like this 'Stub Nose ' L/12 fake where an extension on the tip of the 1 was added ! Besides it appears the side was filed first and the mark added afterwards as the top of the 2 has 'pushed up' the edge .

Douglas