Thanks Dale ....
I had been looking for the full version of this particular issue (later issue) and just not segments for some time .
It is correctly a later copy of the original issue and slightly condensed 95% .
This is as far as I know the original article that was used for that Jewelers magazine . ... with all the pictures .
Even this one is not complete - bottom is missing - not crucial but nice to have in any case . The EK2 and core pictures were dropped in your later article .
The person who posted this one below does not have it complete either - does any one have the bottom part ??
Interesting to note that the full article shows EK2 and an EK1 frame ! ... and indicates both of them being made using the Gablonz method .
And how to tell them apart from conventional manufacturing method ?
One other quit interest thing in the article is ... where it states ... " ... the determination of frame size ..." ??
Would it not naturally be 44x44 ? - or even smaller as to stay within the - 'lets save as much as we can' - concept ?
The method would not include KCs as their was no problem - in keeping up with production .
Douglas
I had been looking for the full version of this particular issue (later issue) and just not segments for some time .
It is correctly a later copy of the original issue and slightly condensed 95% .
This is as far as I know the original article that was used for that Jewelers magazine . ... with all the pictures .
Even this one is not complete - bottom is missing - not crucial but nice to have in any case . The EK2 and core pictures were dropped in your later article .
The person who posted this one below does not have it complete either - does any one have the bottom part ??
Interesting to note that the full article shows EK2 and an EK1 frame ! ... and indicates both of them being made using the Gablonz method .
And how to tell them apart from conventional manufacturing method ?
One other quit interest thing in the article is ... where it states ... " ... the determination of frame size ..." ??
Would it not naturally be 44x44 ? - or even smaller as to stay within the - 'lets save as much as we can' - concept ?
The method would not include KCs as their was no problem - in keeping up with production .
Douglas
Comment