Knights cross with oak leaf for review good or bad

[bnd173d]

Guy whats to trade me this cross. Is it original or not. It is unmarked. Thanks for any info. Ed

[bnd173d]

More photos

[bnd173d]

Last photos.

[AndyC]

Looks like a postwar Souval cross and Oaks to me but i looking from my cellphone



Andy

[Douglas 5]

I am pretty sure Andy is correct here .
The Oaks look like zinc and the KC ribbon is incorrect also - strange 'edge-stitching ' .

Douglas

[bnd173d]

Would this be an older repo. Any value to this. Thanks for any info. Ed

[streptile]

Does not look like a Souval cross to me. Looks like an S&L type.

[kraut72]

just the core S&L, but frame strange/hybride

[Ludwig]

Not original. No value. IMO.

[bnd173d]

The lighting is better. I will try to get better photos

[mwl]

Is it even 3-parts construction...

[Matthieu]

For me this one fake - one piece - you can probably bend it ....

[bnd173d]

Looks like 3 piece and no it doesn't bend. Ed

[bnd173d]

Thanks for the info. I told him i wasn't interested. Thanks again for the info. Ed

[streptile]

Interesting.

If it is indeed a three-piece, I would have thought it looked promising as an early postwar piece at least.

What gives it away as such a bad fake?