EK2 maker

[boch_62]

Hi Trevor,

Please, tell us what You think about this cross ... rarely encounter such an interesting EK2-1939 cross and not sensible is "not notice" it ...

Regards
Jarek

[Stepdale]

Hi Trevor, I second Jarek's motion!

[streptile]

Oh, hi.

This one isn't an "easy one." My very first thought was W&H 109, the moment you posted it. But I compared to known examples and didn't find a frame match so I never posted.

Give me a few days and I'll try to look a bit deeper at my saved images and post again.

[boch_62]

Oh, hi.

This one isn't an "easy one." My very first thought was W&H 109, the moment you posted it. But I compared to known examples and didn't find a frame match so I never posted.

Give me a few days and I'll try to look a bit deeper at my saved images and post again.

[boch_62]

Also at this time, I compared the cross which we discussed with others crosses W&H (recognized as such) with a standard frame and frame "#".
The similarities (for me) to our cross are large, IMO it has to be W&H, provided that the pattern recognized by us is correct.
I paid particular attention to internal and external continuation.

Jarek

[boch_62]

obverse other crosses W&H with frame "#"

[boch_62]

reverse of the other crosses W&H with frame typical

[boch_62]

In addition, for me, has always been, notes a big difference quality (and finish) of individual units deemed crosses W&H (109)... but it's like a different topic for discussion ...

Regards
Jarek