EK2 frame 1939 cross 1914

[Douglas 5]

Yes OR - please show that example .

Douglas

[kid74]

One question for all - Did you see like this before?

WR Kirill

[kid74]

.... and new cross chipper than remove frame for old cross, am I wrong?

WR Kirill

[Douglas 5]

Yes Kirill I have seen that type and have one .

Douglas

[kid74]

Yes Kirill I have seen that type and have one .

Douglas

If it possible, please, share it for Me. Thank you&

WR Kirill

[Douglas 5]

Its about 44x44 with a small core ,

Douglas

[kid74]

Its about 44x44 with a small core ,

Douglas

..... I think it is type of 30-th (IMO) ..... My frame have size 44,2 &

WR Kirill

[kid74]

Its about 44x44 with a small core ,

Douglas

.... but very unusual too&

WR Kirill

[Douglas 5]

Different alright -- ring marked J .

Douglas

[kid74]

Different alright -- ring marked J .

Douglas

I know supposition - "J" is Juncker mark....

WR Kirill

[Douglas 5]

Read the reply in the Imperial section ... surprizing .
The one from post 21 has a core that is far too small for the frame and almost falls out . Don't think it is a Frankenstein .

Douglas

[Douglas 5]

One can put a thin knife between frame and core - it's that lose !

Douglas

[Robert P.]

I really like these 1914/1939 crosses. This is an example, one of my favorites, an early '39 3-flaw Juncker frame with an Imperial AWS type 3 core...just love it!
Look at the 'exquisite' finish on the frame obverse! Ha! Typical Juncker.

Robert

[Douglas 5]

Yes a nice 3-flaw Juncker frame variant .

Douglas

[kid74]

Yes a nice 3-flaw Juncker frame variant .

Douglas

.... but not about we are talking&

WR Kirill