Emedals - Medalbook

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Army Honor Roll Clasp/Heer Eherenblattspange

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Army Honor Roll Clasp/Heer Eherenblattspange

    Army Honor Roll Clasp/Heer Eherenblattspange
    <O</O
    In researching this award, while the General Wehrmacht Awards Forum appears to be for Honor Awards (amongst others), I found the most number of threads regarding this particular award on this Forum so am posting my thread here for observation and comment. This is appropriate since the Wehrmacht Honor Clasps were officially worn on the ribbon of the Iron Cross 2<SUP>nd</SUP> Class.
    <O</O
    This clasp came to me many years ago exactly as shown: mounted on the folded 28 cm. long ribbon – exactly as it might have been found in an award case – but without that case. Both the award and the ribbon show the ravages of exposure and the passage of time. The frosty and burnished gilding are gone. The ribbon is somewhat faded and shows wear/deterioration at several places along the edge. However, it does have that soft, silky feel to it and also the appropriate loops along the edge which indicate to me that the ribbon is period original.
    <O</O
    This clasp does not conform exactly to those produced by Klein of Hanau which I have seen pictured in books. Is there possibly another type by Klein? Or were there other known makers of these clasps? This type does appear pictured in “The Iron Time” (1<SUP>st</SUP> edition) on page 284, and the reverse side again on page 334 of the 2<SUP>nd</SUP> edition.
    <O</O
    Several anomalies exist:
    <O</O
    - The oakleaves of the wreath touch at the top where they meet;
    <O</O
    - The ribbon at the base of the wreath measures 19mm across, versus the 21 mm indicated in the WAF reference thread on this award. All other measurements are consistent with those stated in that reference thread;
    <O</O
    - Further, on the reverse side a round patch has been firmly placed over the area where the prongs/pins (which appear to be round) affix the clasp to the ribbon. There is also what must be a thin, round metal plate – through which the pins pass – between the ribbon and the patch material. This is magnetic, whereas I understand that the clasps were non-magnetic.
    <O</O
    It is difficult to tell if the swastika forms an integral part with the wreath or if it was soldered into place. As well, without peeling-off the fabric patch and removing the metal plate by bending the pins, it is impossible to tell if the swastika is solid or hollow on the reverse. The thin metal disc prevents this determination by feel.
    <O</O
    I am hoping that fellow collectors with greater knowledge of this particular award will find benefit in seeing this piece and, hopefully, be able to provide substantive feedback regarding the anomalies mentioned. If possible, it would be nice to know if this example is a period original or not.
    <O</O
    With thanks, in advance, and regards,

    John
    Attached Files

    #2
    More:
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      And more:
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        This pinned thread may assist you:

        http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=699185

        Best - Greg

        Comment


          #5
          Yes, Greg, thank you indeed for pointing me to this well-written and most helpful reference thread by "Honor". I don't know how I could have missed it.

          Therein, I seem to have found my example: in his posting #31 under ' "best" fakes ' (row 2, #2); and also posting #82 under "Fake Clasps: design copied from '1957' version" (top row right #4). These two examples may in fact be the same. The ribbon on which they are mounted appears faded, as is the case with mine.

          The obvious difference with my example is the metal disc and fabric patch affixed over the reverse mounting of the clasp. If my example is, indeed, a fake then one might assume this to have been done purely in an effort to decieve by covering-up and preventing examination of other details of clasp construction.

          While my question as to period originality may now have been answered, I nonetheless look forward to comments and feedback - confirming or otherwise - from members regarding this matter....before I relegate this item to my "fakes bin".

          Thanks and regards,

          John
          Last edited by jwburchell; 12-05-2014, 01:08 PM.

          Comment


            #6
            Hi John, that is how I read your one as well.
            It's a clever idea to cover the prongs and I think adds to the belief that it's a fake.
            Best - Greg

            Comment

            Users Viewing this Thread

            Collapse

            There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

            Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

            Working...
            X