EK 1 65 Klein&Qenzer for review

[Szary]

I like it -especially the way 65 numbers are shaped,but also have some bad feeling.I would like to know Your opinions. Learning in progress...

[streptile]

No problems. Original.

[Maciej G]

Cześć Szary. :-)
Good K&Q cross!
Best regards.

Maciej G.

[Stu W]

I agree, authentic cross. What feature(s) were causing you concern?

Regards,
Stu

[Tony T-S]

Is this a C core version? Lovely cross, I will gladly have it if you don't want it

[Szary]

Thanks for answers gentlemens,dzięki Maciej.

Stu,my concerns were (beside begginer's paranoia):
1-The pin look a little like it was one piece with back-which shouldn't happen,as I understand.
2-The cross is asymetric.If You compare left and right arm there's a difference. The outer part of frame-the"margin" is wider on left arm.

Tony , after comparing(and finding out what is C core ) I think so.The shape of 3 fits perfectly.And as it's my first EK1 it will stay with me a while.

[Tony T-S]

I'd certainly be holding onto it. Congrats

[Ralph Arndt]

[fresco]

Hallo
I bought in 90's Gebirgsjager grouping for sergant 2nd dev. including WW2 Iron Cross 1st class mm"65" + org.box like yours.
Nice orginal cross.
Regards,Fresco

[AndyC]

A good 65 for me


Andy