Interesting RK-KVK on Weitze

[Leroy]

Anyone see this interesting RK-KVK on Weitze?:https://www.weitze.net/detail/55/Rit...n__218055.html

He says a Deschler product meant for commercial sale, but that the company just used "10" instead of its designated LDO "L/10".

[Leroy]

If this is correct (and it looks OK to me, but I'm not an expert on RK-KVK's), it is an interesting commentary on how a major company ("1" on the PKZ number list and also holding the first LDO number of "L/10") handled number usage.

[Douglas 5]

Interesting mark .

Douglas

[Patrick W]

This one sold not long ago at Hermann Historica I think- original cross for sure with legit variant mark

[Leroy]

It should make us reconsider what we really know.

[all1knew]

complete with the die flaws as well. Do the crosses (as scarce that they are) that are marked "20" share the same flaws?

William Kramer

[Peter J.]

Leroy, what is it we really?

cheers
Peter

[Leroy]

Leroy, what is it we really know?

cheers
Peter

Well, from this piece, we know now that even the top of the line manufacturer must have thought this marking was OK.