EK1 S&L Mm 4 opinions please

[Friedrich_K]

Hello Guys

I would greatly appreciate any comment on the following EK1 S&L Mm4 with presentation case. What do you think?

Thanks in advance.

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...9166_2_big.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...9166_8_big.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...166_10_big.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...9166_4_big.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...9166_5_big.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...ller-4-s-l.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...9166_3_big.jpg

http://www.warrelics.eu/forum/attach...9166_7_big.jpg

[Friedrich_K]

Hi all,

I really could use some expert help with this - since I have it on hold and would like to hear what you all think of it - especially since it has dark fillings all arond the frame.

So is there anyone on this board that can guide me a little, please?

[Woolgar]

It looks like a nice S&L set to me

Nick

[Douglas 5]

May have been nice at one time . Very bad repair .
No more than 130 Euros -- for the case . Get a better cross !

Douglas

[Friedrich_K]

Hi

Thank you for sharing your opinions with me. It is very much appreciated. I find judging EK1 1939 extremely difficult.

Ok, the cross is repaired badly, but do you think it is a real or fake Cross ?

The Cross' backplate seems to be magnetic but the pin isn't - is this good or bad.

I've heard some talk about crosses which have a pre-1945 front and core but a post war back plate. Can anyone shed some more light on this please?

I do like the condition of the iron core though, so what would be a fair price for the Cross?

Thank you so much for all your help.

[sanya13]

IMO this the type is so called "postwar "Steinhauer & Lück ,
but is have same marked big rectangle shape 4 original wartime cross

[Douglas 5]

Putting the pictures in here for better viewing .

Douglas

[Douglas 5]

.

[Douglas 5]

..