I noticed that Deumer used two different dies in making their EKII spanges. I have labeled them A & B. The differences is the cutout in the wing shoulders, beak is cutoff, and the claws thickness. The A is not marked, the B is marked. Comments are welcome. Jim
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Deumer EKII spanges
Collapse
X
-
Interesting Jim! Similar thing can be seen among the WB´s as well with the differance that both designs are known with different makermarkesRegards
Hans N
Don´t throw away your fake WB´s! Get in touch with me.
I collect them for reference purposes for the benefit of the hobby (for the right "fake" price of course).
Comment
-
HI Jim,
I agree they do seem to come from different dies and your "A" type is a real beauty with perfect detail and finish : a great bird. No sure if I'm off in left field again ( or my glasses are overdue) but looking at my 2 full size EK II spanges and assuming they are both Deumer this maker may have even had more than 2 dies (or it could also just be die wear) because mine look different than yours.
Sorry for the poor picts (but they are the only ones I have at the moment) but to me
1) my left specimen (which appears to be nickle silver as there is no tombac colour "seeping out" of the silver finish despite the wear/age) is reminiscent of your "A" version design wise for the head and wing/shoulder area. It is also unmarked like yours but you'll notice the detail is very deep (tri-dimensionnal?) particularly in the chest area
2) my right specimen is a tombac piece marked "L/11" but the design also looks different than both of yours. The detail isnt as good/delicate as your "A" specimen but the wing, head and other detail is better than your "B" specimen. It could just be an earlier strike from the same "B" die before it developped the beak flaw
Best regards
JCAttached Files
Comment
-
I just sent you a PM regarding this one, Jim. However, this is also a marked L/11 type A, too, in it's original packet. This is actually a rather rare and sought after Spange packet, and more to the point the Deumer address on the packet is devoid of a frame.
My apologies for the night pictures taken on my phone.
Best,
Marcus
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment