Knight's Cross for review

[Husker402]

I've never owned and I'm not an expert on these no matter how much I read on here. Please have a look at this one and please share your thoughts. Looks liek it's marked "800" and "L/12". I don't want to buy it unless it passes the test!

[kraut72]

sorry but this KC simply bad fake

[sgabrie854]

Stinker

[AndyC]

Sorry but this KC is not original



Andy

[Husker402]

Thank you all for the input. I can't tell you how much I really appreciate it. I had a feeling this one wasn't right. My search continues....

[Tom B]

Pretty bad fake alright Tom

[kaiserwilhelm2]

[Tony T-S]

Whatever it might have been (it reminds me of the potentially fake post war S&L look alikes with swaz we've been discussion in the 57er forum, though I don't believe is was one), the stamps have ruled it out of any value. Yuck.

[walter1010de]

Whatever it might have been (it reminds me of the potentially fake post war S&L look alikes with swaz we've been discussion in the 57er forum, though I don't believe is was one), the stamps have ruled it out of any value. Yuck.

Fully agree. Could not say it better - a "pimped" post war cross.

[Husker402]

I appreciate the input and my sincerest thanks to all!

[Ludwig]

If it´s a Juncker you are looking for, try Weitze or Winkler. They very often have them. Expensive, but it could be worth it sometimes!