kc for review

[horst1930]

IMO a nice original one although loop ring has obviously been replaced somewhen.

[horst1930]

I like it anyway.

[horst1930]

last two

[kraut72]

original early Juncker KC with zinkcore and replaced loop

[Rolfi]

original early Juncker KC with zinkcore and replaced loop

Yes

[Leroy]

... and replaced loop

Not necessarily replaced.

[streptile]

Not necessarily replaced.

I agree.

[Tom B]

It's an ok RK, but I don't like the loop

[kraut72]

"but I don't like the loop

agreed

[streptile]

One of these sold at auction within the past few years as a fake:



In my recollection the very first Juncker RKs had neusilber frames, zinc cores and silvered brass loops. Or am I misremembering?

[Leroy]

In my recollection the very first Juncker RKs had neusilber frames, zinc cores and silvered brass loops. Or am I misremembering?

You are NOT "misremembering". This is a very nice, very early and very scarce cross.

[Tony T-S]

So it has no silver content mark because it's neusilber? It also appears not to have had the beading trimmed to fit the swaz. What a great score. Congrats

[vonStubben]

Not necessarily replaced.

I also agree.

[Ludwig]

I'm surprised this cross passed the control! Sloppy work. But still - it has all the features of an original Juncker!

[dot-byf]

From these pictures it looks good, but to say for sure better pictures would be needed IMO. (Being one of the paranoid ones..).

dot-byf