EspenlaubMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RK on E-Stand

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    RK on E-Stand

    Hello,

    I have heard that there were jewelers copies of Iron Crosses and then I have heard that it is a fancy term for a modern copy, anyone have any opinions on this one on E-Stand?

    http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...65#post6023265
    Last edited by Knight_ridergta; 08-21-2013, 03:07 PM. Reason: Spelling

    #2
    Without looking at the cross on the estand I can clear up one thing: copies were made in the TR period for wear in combat to protect the original medal from loss or damage in battle. The irony is that many of these 'copies' were of superior quality to the originals...values for these jewelers medals have always been less than the 'real' thing though. I will take a peek at the medal in question and comment on it though I am not an RK 'expert'.
    Edit- I doubt a period RK with the added Swords and Oakleaves would ever sell for 750.00.....postwar IMO.
    Lets see what some of the others have to say.

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for the comment, he claims it does not glow and it is magnetic, hopefully an expert on these will come along and clear it up as it is interesting.


      Originally posted by ValhallaMilitaria View Post
      Without looking at the cross on the estand I can clear up one thing: copies were made in the TR period for wear in combat to protect the original medal from loss or damage in battle. The irony is that many of these 'copies' were of superior quality to the originals...values for these jewelers medals have always been less than the 'real' thing though. I will take a peek at the medal in question and comment on it though I am not an RK 'expert'.
      Edit- I doubt a period RK with the added Swords and Oakleaves would ever sell for 750.00.....postwar IMO.
      Lets see what some of the others have to say.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by ValhallaMilitaria View Post
        Without looking at the cross on the estand I can clear up one thing: copies were made in the TR period for wear in combat to protect the original medal from loss or damage in battle. The irony is that many of these 'copies' were of superior quality to the originals...values for these jewelers medals have always been less than the 'real' thing though. I will take a peek at the medal in question and comment on it though I am not an RK 'expert'.
        Who told you that? How would an RK made during Wartime be a copy?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Knight_ridergta View Post
          Thanks for the comment, he claims it does not glow and it is magnetic, hopefully an expert on these will come along and clear it up as it is interesting.
          Your are welcome- I too am intrigued to see what we can learn here.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Darrell View Post
            Who told you that? How would an RK made during Wartime be a copy?
            I have read it in many places....many jewelers copies were made and worn while the real issue medal stayed at home....this was not a rule, it was up to the individual recepient to decide what to do with their medal....either wear it, or wear a copy into battle.
            I thought everyone knew this....
            I also think you are misunderstanding what I am saying Darrell.
            Copy does not mean 'fake'

            Comment


              #7
              Before the Internet days I would hear of "Jewelers copies". I have never believed any of them, in fact, many of the "800" marked crosses and no 65, 2, 21 or whatever were called "Jeweler copies". I have seen EKIIs that I think were modified for use but I seriously doubt the "jeweler" theory. "If" there are any originals they are far and few!
              Best Wishes,
              Bob
              www.collectortocollectormilitaria.com

              sigpic

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by ValhallaMilitaria View Post
                Without looking at the cross on the estand I can clear up one thing: copies were made in the TR period for wear in combat to protect the original medal from loss or damage in battle. The irony is that many of these 'copies' were of superior quality to the originals...values for these jewelers medals have always been less than the 'real' thing though. I will take a peek at the medal in question and comment on it though I am not an RK 'expert'.
                Edit- I doubt a period RK with the added Swords and Oakleaves would ever sell for 750.00.....postwar IMO.
                Lets see what some of the others have to say.
                It is very interesting to realize that even in 2013 the myth of the " higher quality jeweller copies" is still told to new collectors.

                There were no jeweller copies! Never ever! Before October 1941 several compnies could legally produce and sell the RK, after that date only via the PKZ could an awardee request and get another RK. And they were exactly of the same good or bad quality as all the others, namely either a Juncker, a S&L, a Zimmermann, a Godet, a 3/4 ring, a Schickle, or a K&Q.

                Dietrich
                B&D PUBLISHING
                Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by ValhallaMilitaria View Post
                  I have read it in many places....many jewelers copies were made and worn while the real issue medal stayed at home....this was not a rule, it was up to the individual recepient to decide what to do with their medal....either wear it, or wear a copy into battle.
                  I thought everyone knew this....e'
                  Sorry, but this is complete BS and was most likely written 'in many places' by dealers who wanted to sell whatever fake as a "jeweller'scopy". This is proven to be wrong by extensive original documentation ( albeit in German language ...).

                  I can only suggest to read in the correct places ....

                  Dietrich
                  B&D PUBLISHING
                  Premium Books from Collectors for Collectors

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Thanks everyone for clearing that up

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Interesting....there are many dealer sites still writing that up and its still something I come across in books form the mid 90's or before.
                      So any purported 'jewelers' copy is a postwar fake?
                      Thanks for the learning curve....just goes to show that a little 'knowledge' can get one in trouble.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by BobI View Post
                        Before the Internet days I would hear of "Jewelers copies". I have never believed any of them, in fact, many of the "800" marked crosses and no 65, 2, 21 or whatever were called "Jeweler copies". I have seen EKIIs that I think were modified for use but I seriously doubt the "jeweler" theory. "If" there are any originals they are far and few!
                        Best Wishes,
                        Bob
                        And if there were/are....how would one authenticate them? I have to admit- I am a bit taken aback....the whole jewelers copy thing is something I have read about, heard about and seen on dealer sites for over 20 years.....geez.
                        My apologies to all.
                        Next time I will remember what a role model told me years ago "its better to keep ones mouth shut and have people think you a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"
                        Eric
                        Last edited by ValhallaMilitaria; 08-21-2013, 04:19 PM.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          I guess hearing something from a German vet would be a solid answer


                          Originally posted by ValhallaMilitaria View Post
                          And if there were/are....how would one authenticate them? I have to admit- I am a bit taken aback....the whole jewelers copy thing is something I have read about, heard about and seen on dealer sites for over 20 years.....geez.
                          My apologies to all.
                          Next time I will remember what a role model told me years ago "its better to keep ones mouth shut and have people think you a fool than to open it and remove all doubt"
                          Eric

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Would a jewellers copy would be more expensive than the real thing in ww2?

                            I wonder what was the price paid by the Wermacht for an RK to be manufactured? If cheap I guess then replacements seem logical?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by Knight_ridergta View Post
                              I guess hearing something from a German vet would be a solid answer
                              Yes, I am wracking my brain trying to recall which book(s) I read that in....what really blows my mind here is just how sure I was that I was certain.
                              I do still wonder though about this cross on the estand....I guess its postwar then.
                              Sometimes this hobby just isn't any fun.

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X