KVK1 mmL15

[tinmantis]

Hi guys,
what are your thoughts on this cross.
I've asked before, but now have better pics...
regards
jon

[tinmantis]

2

[tinmantis]

3

[tinmantis]

It is very well made, very high quality.
Here it is compared to another marked 50 (I think it's a 50? I'll start another thread on this one too)
This comparison shows how finely tapered the arms are

[Frank Heukemes]

These are believed to be ok by most collectors. Some sceptics are there because of the L15 EK fakes by Floch. I once saw one of these KVKs in a vet grouping, I believe they are fine.

[George Stimson]

I also believe that this type of "L15" is good.

[tinmantis]

thanks
yes, one of the first 'rules' I learnt about KVK1's in my younger days, was 'NO VEINS ON LEAVES'...
I've since learned different. This is a beauty. Doesn't really come across in the pics, but real nice.
One thing I did notice is the space between the arms is irregular. Were the 'swords' ground off by hand? or was the die this irregular shape?
Pics hopefully explain what I mean:
regards
jon

[tinmantis]

2

[Jim Baker]

Jim's L15.

Jon,

Here's mine. Everyone here thought it was good as do I.

[Jim Baker]

Jim's L15.

Flip side.....

[tinmantis]

I see it has the one smooth section too, so it's the die.
nice cross btw!
regards
jon